In the high-stakes world of professional darts, where every dart thrown can rewrite destinies, few moments capture the sport’s raw intensity like a last-gasp qualification for a major. Raymond van Barneveld, the legendary Dutch maestro known affectionately as “Barney,” has long been a figure of inspiration and heartbreak. At 58, the four-time world champion is defying Father Time, chasing one more shot at glory. But his dramatic clinch of a spot in the upcoming World Grand Prix—a prestigious double-in, double-out showdown in Leicester—has ignited a firestorm of debate, with fellow pros decrying the qualification process as fundamentally unfair. As the arrows fly and the crowd roars, one voice cuts through the noise: “This just isn’t right.”
Barney’s path to the Grand Prix was nothing short of a rollercoaster, a testament to his unyielding grit but also a lightning rod for accusations of systemic luck over merit. It all hinged on a grueling Pro Tour grind, where consistency is king and upsets lurk around every corner. In the opening round, Barney faced a relatively modest challenge, dispatching his opponent with the kind of veteran savvy that’s kept him relevant amid a new generation of firebrands like Luke Humphries and Michael van Gerwen. But it was the second-round thriller against Damon Heta that truly tested the limits of fate. With the finish line in sight, Heta—a formidable Australian with a reputation for ice-cold checkouts—stepped up for a match dart that could have ended Barney’s hopes right there. The dart veered agonizingly wide, handing the Dutch icon a lifeline he seized with both hands, averaging nearly 98 in a display of pure adrenaline-fueled brilliance.
Fate dealt another kind hand when Ross Smith, a top-ranked contender, withdrew from the event, reshuffling the draw in Barney’s favor. This propelled him into a showdown with Ritchie Edhouse, turning what could have been a brutal elimination bout into a winnable skirmish. Barney emerged victorious, but not without the weight of the world on his shoulders. As he later reflected in the heat of the moment, this wasn’t just another win—it was survival. “Something like that can make all the difference,” he’d say of those razor-thin margins, his voice laced with the exhaustion of a man who’s thrown a million darts in pursuit of immortality.
Yet, for all the cheers from his loyal fans, Barney’s qualification—built largely on just two quarter-final runs in the Pro Tour—has drawn sharp rebukes from within the darts fraternity. Vincent van der Voort, Barney’s compatriot and a seasoned pro himself, didn’t hold back during a candid chat on the Darts Draait Door podcast. Watching from the sidelines, Van der Voort painted a picture of a ladder rigged against the truly deserving. “According to what I’ve seen, it’s not only due to his own efforts but also to a number of favorable circumstances,” he observed, dissecting how Barney’s easier route contrasted starkly with the blood, sweat, and tears shed by others.
Van der Voort’s ire zeroed in on the broader flaws plaguing the qualification criteria, a cocktail of Order of Merit points, Pro Tour performances, and Euro Tour seedings that often rewards the erratic over the reliable. Take Dave Chisnall, for instance—a powerhouse who wrapped up the season 17th in both the overall Order of Merit and Pro Tour standings. Chisnall, with his laser-guided precision and unshakeable temperament, was seeded into every Euro Tour event, only to stumble in the opening round a staggering nine times in a row. “He lost his opening match nine times in a row,” Van der Voort pointed out, his tone a mix of sympathy and exasperation. “That means he didn’t deserve to qualify.” Yet, Chisnall’s near-miss—edged out by the slimmest of margins—exposed the cracks: a system where one bad day can eclipse a season of excellence, leaving high-caliber players like him on the outside looking in.
The frustration boils over into a clarion call for reform. “Something really has to change,” Van der Voort urged, his words carrying the weight of a man who’s navigated these treacherous waters himself. “The players’ union needs to step in here, because this just isn’t right.” It’s a sentiment echoing through locker rooms and online forums alike, where darts’ governing bodies face mounting pressure to overhaul a process that’s as unpredictable as a wayward 180. Team principal meetings, meant to foster fair play, have devolved into what Van der Voort calls “pretty embarrassing” spectacles, with factions voting for short-term gains that perpetuate inequality. In a sport where rankings can shift on a single leg, such biases risk eroding the meritocracy that draws millions to the oche each year.
For Barney, though, the controversy is just noise amid the pursuit of passion. Van der Voort, ever the supportive peer, was quick to salute his elder’s resilience. That Heta match? “Drama,” he called it, recounting the electric tension as the crowd held its breath. And against Edhouse, it felt like “a tournament within a tournament,” with Barney acutely aware that failure meant missing the Grand Prix—a stage where legends like Phil Taylor and Eric Bristow once etched their names in history. Post-qualification, the relief was palpable, but so was the challenge of sustaining momentum. Stephen Bunting’s strong showing only amplified the pressure, leaving Barney scrambling to rediscover his rhythm.
At his age, tweaks are in order, Van der Voort suggests—shorten those marathon warm-ups that stretch to three hours, opt for shorter shafts to quicken the release, tighten the setup for efficiency. “It’s challenging at his age,” he admits, but adds with optimism, “He can still hit a high level if he has energy and intensity.” Gone are the days when Barney could cherry-pick events; now, with a denser calendar crammed with Euro Tours and Pro Tours, he’s compelled to play it all, no stone left unturned. It’s a grind that’s both invigorating and exhausting, but one that keeps the fire alive in a career spanning decades.
As the World Grand Prix looms, Barney steps into the spotlight not just as a competitor, but as a symbol of darts’ enduring drama. Will his qualification propel him to another iconic run, silencing the critics with a flurry of doubles? Or will it fuel the push for a fairer system, ensuring that future qualifiers reward the grind over the gamble? One thing’s certain: in the world of darts, where fortunes turn on the flight of a tiny arrow, Barney’s story reminds us why we love it—unpredictable, unforgiving, and utterly compelling. With the field’s elite converging in Leicester, all eyes will be on the Dutch veteran, hoping he proves the doubters wrong one checkout at a time.
Leave a Reply