In the glittering, tension-filled world of professional darts, where every throw can swing from triumph to heartbreak in the blink of an eye, the Players Championship Finals has always been a breeding ground for unforgettable drama. Held at the iconic Butlin’s Minehead Resort in Somerset, this elite showdown—part of the PDC’s glittering calendar—draws the sport’s top guns to compete for a slice of the £500,000 prize fund, with the winner pocketing £100,000 and a coveted spot in the history books. But on a crisp Friday evening in November 2025, as the Winter Gardens arena pulsed with the electric hum of 2,000 fervent fans, the spotlight shifted from precision scoring to raw emotion. Dutch powerhouse Dirk van Duijvenbode, the 32-year-old sensation nicknamed “Aubergenius” for his aubergine-themed entrance and thunderous power throws, found himself entangled in a heated on-stage altercation with referee Charlie Corstorphine. The flashpoint? An “illegal dart” that turned a potential lifeline into a match-ending dagger, propelling underdog Madars Razma to a 6-3 victory and leaving van Duijvenbode fuming in the first round.
Van Duijvenbode, a towering figure from The Hague ranked firmly in the world’s top 20, arrived in Minehead riding a wave of momentum. His 2025 season had been a masterclass in consistency: deep runs in the European Tour events, a quarter-final finish at the World Grand Prix, and that unforgettable nine-darter against Gerwyn Price in the Dutch Darts Masters that still has fans rewinding clips. With his signature purple flights slicing through the air like arrows from a medieval siege, he was the pre-match favorite against Razma, the 29-year-old Latvian qualifier who’s been quietly building a reputation as darts’ resilient dark horse. Razma, with his methodical style and ice-cool checkouts, had scraped through the Pro Tour Order of Merit to earn his spot, but few predicted he’d turn the tables so decisively—or so controversially.
The match unfolded as a gritty back-and-forth, the oche becoming a battlefield of traded 180s and stubborn doubles. Razma struck first, edging ahead with a clinical 92 checkout in the opener, his double 16 landing with the precision of a surgeon’s scalpel. Van Duijvenbode responded in kind, firing back with a brace of legs to level at 2-2, his maximums booming like fireworks in the packed hall. But as the score crept to 5-3 in Razma’s favor, the Dutchman’s frustration simmered beneath the surface. The Latvian, unfazed by the pressure, had absorbed van Duijvenbode’s early barrage like a sponge, his 40% checkout rate a testament to his steely resolve. Then came the moment that would dominate headlines: van Duijvenbode, sensing elimination looming, unleashed a blistering 180, reducing his leg score from 287 to a nerve-jangling 107. The crowd roared, the air thick with anticipation as he returned for the kill.
The next visit yielded nothing—a missed double that kept the door ajar but the hinges creaking. Back at the board, with the match on the line, van Duijvenbode needed double 20 to steal the leg and breathe life into his campaign. His first dart clipped the single 20 wire, scraping just 15 points and leaving him on 92. Composure cracking under the weight of the moment, he gripped the second dart, wound up, and released—or so it seemed. In a split-second lapse, the throw veered sideways, more a defiant flick than a scoring attempt, embedding awkwardly in the board’s periphery. The arena held its breath. Referee Corstorphine, a veteran of countless high-stakes calls with his unflappable demeanor and sharp eye for infractions, didn’t hesitate. Striding to the board with the authority of a judge delivering a verdict, he plucked the dart free and boomed into the microphone: “15 [scored]. That last dart does not count.”
The ruling was swift and unyielding, interpreting the sideways motion as an abandonment of the turn—a clear violation under PDC guidelines that demand throws be directed at the board with intent to score, ensuring safety and fairness. By nullifying it, van Duijvenbode’s total cratered to a paltry 5, an uncatchable single-dart finish that handed Razma the leg on a platter. The Latvian, ever the professional, sealed the deal moments later with a composed double, advancing to the last 32 amid polite applause that couldn’t mask the stunned silence. But for van Duijvenbode, the sting was immediate and visceral. His face contorted in disbelief, he stormed toward Corstorphine, gesturing wildly at the board as if willing the dart back into legitimacy. What followed was a tense, whispered showdown on stage, the Dutchman’s animated protests slicing through the hush like a poorly aimed arrow.
“Why doesn’t it count?” van Duijvenbode demanded, his voice a mix of incredulity and ire, pointing emphatically as he sought answers. Corstorphine, standing his ground with the poise that comes from years policing the oche’s unwritten codes, explained the infraction calmly: the throw’s trajectory screamed intent to halt rather than hit, a rule etched in PDC stone to prevent gamesmanship or unsafe antics. The exchange, captured in crystal-clear PDC footage, lasted mere seconds but felt eternal, the camera zooming in on van Duijvenbode’s clenched fist and furrowed brow. “He’s deemed to throw an illegal dart,” one pundit later quipped on air, capturing the sentiment that rippled through social media like a viral 180. Hashtags like #IllegalDart and #AubergeniusOutrage trended within minutes, fans divided between sympathy for a player robbed of rhythm and support for the referee’s ironclad enforcement.
This wasn’t just a loss; it was a lightning rod for broader debates in darts’ booming ecosystem. The sport, exploding in popularity since Luke Littler’s teenage supernova lit up Ally Pally, now grapples with the razor-thin line between passion and protocol. Sideways throws, while rare, echo infamous moments—like Eric Bristow’s underarm experiments in the ’80s or modern bust-ups over bounced darts. Officials like Corstorphine aren’t villains but vital cogs, their calls protecting the integrity of a game where margins are millimeters and fortunes flip on a dime. Post-match, van Duijvenbode retreated to the practice area, replaying the leg in his mind’s eye, confiding to a compatriot, “I thought it was in play.” Razma, gracious in victory, tipped his cap to his foe: “Dirk is a powerhouse; he pushed me all the way. These moments make the game what it is.” The Latvian now eyes bigger fish, perhaps a run to the quarters against the likes of Damon Heta or Joe Cullen, his underdog tale adding fuel to Minehead’s fire.
As the Players Championship Finals churn on—Michael van Gerwen lurking in the draw, Luke Humphries defending his form—the van Duijvenbode saga serves as a stark reminder of darts’ human pulse. For “Aubergenius,” who once stunned the world with that 2022 nine-darter, it’s a bitter pill, but one he’ll swallow en route to the Ally Pally World Championship in December. In a sport where composure is the ultimate double-out, this “controversy on stage” underscores the chaos that keeps fans glued: raw, unfiltered, and utterly compelling. Razma marches on, but the real victor? The drama that turns a simple throw into sporting folklore, ensuring the oche remains darts’ most unpredictable stage.
Leave a Reply