
In the high-stakes world of Premier League transfers, Manchester City have been handed a bold challenge: swoop in and secure Crystal Palace’s defensive star Marc Guehi before rivals Liverpool can finalize their pursuit. The 25-year-old England international, lauded as “exceptional” by former England manager Gareth Southgate, has emerged as one of the summer’s most coveted talents. With Liverpool leading the race to bolster their backline, former City player and coach Stuart Pearce has sounded a clarion call for the Sky Blues to disrupt their rivals’ plans and address a critical weakness in their squad.
Guehi’s stock has soared since his standout performances for Crystal Palace and England. With his contract entering its final year, Palace are open to offers, reportedly setting a £70 million price tag for the versatile centre-back. Liverpool, fresh off a Premier League title win under Arne Slot, have prioritized Guehi to fill the void left by Jarell Quansah’s departure to Bayer Leverkusen and uncertainties surrounding Ibrahima Konate, who has attracted interest from Real Madrid. The Reds have already made marquee signings, including Florian Wirtz, Hugo Ekitike, Jeremie Frimpong, and Milos Kerkez, but their defense remains a work in progress. However, Pearce believes Manchester City, who have also splashed out on talents like Rayan Cherki and Tijjani Reijnders, should seize the opportunity to strengthen their own backline.
“When they won the Champions League a couple of years ago, I think they won it on being very, very tough to score against,” Pearce, now 63, reflected. He highlighted City’s defensive solidity as the cornerstone of their 2023 triumph, with a consistent back four led by Kyle Walker neutralizing threats. “That was their strong card,” he added, emphasizing Guehi’s fit for City’s expansive style. “He’s got the ability to deal with things one-on-one on the counter-attack. You’ve got to be good at that if you’re a Manchester City player.” Pearce’s concern stems from City’s aging and injury-prone centre-backs—Manuel Akanji, John Stones, and Nathan Ake, all in their 30s—leaving the squad vulnerable. “It does worry me a little bit,” he admitted, pinpointing the backline as City’s potential “Achilles heel.”
Guehi’s appeal lies in his composure, athleticism, and ability to thrive under pressure. Since joining Palace from Chelsea in 2021 for £18 million, he has made 136 appearances, earning praise for his leadership as club captain and his performances at Euro 2024. His ability to handle one-on-one situations and contribute to build-up play aligns perfectly with Pep Guardiola’s philosophy. Liverpool, however, see Guehi as the ideal partner for Virgil van Dijk, especially with Tottenham also re-entering the race after an earlier rejected bid. Insiders suggest Guehi favors a move to Anfield, where he could compete for major honors, but City’s pedigree and financial muscle make them a formidable contender.
The transfer saga is further complicated by City’s ongoing legal battles over 115 alleged breaches of Premier League financial rules, which have sparked debate about their future stability. Some speculate that a hefty fine or even relegation could loom, prompting caution among potential signings. Yet, City’s recent £1 billion Puma deal and their pursuit of other high-profile targets like Rodrygo signal unwavering ambition. Liverpool, meanwhile, are balancing their interest in Guehi with a potential record-breaking move for Newcastle’s Alexander Isak, which could stretch their budget.
Pearce’s endorsement of Guehi underscores the defender’s versatility and potential to transform City’s defense. “I’m a big fan of this kid,” he said, urging City to act decisively. As the transfer window nears its close, the battle for Guehi promises to be a defining moment in the Premier League’s power struggle. Will Manchester City heed Pearce’s advice and pull off a dramatic coup, or will Liverpool secure their man and solidify their title defense? The stage is set for a thrilling showdown between two English football giants.
Leave a Reply