In the sweltering embrace of Asia’s late-season tournaments, where the sun beats down like an unrelenting opponent, the world of professional tennis is once again confronting a foe more insidious than any rival’s forehand: extreme heat. The Ningbo Open in China, a bustling WTA 500 event known for its humid coastal vibes and fierce competition, became the latest battleground for this enduring issue. Local wildcard Zhu Lin stunned the tennis world on October 17, 2025, by ousting British sensation Emma Raducanu 3-6, 6-4, 6-1 in the second round. But beyond the scoreboard, it was Raducanu’s visible struggle with the oppressive conditions that stole the spotlight, reigniting a passionate debate about player welfare in an era of climate unpredictability.
Raducanu, the 22-year-old former US Open champion whose career has been a whirlwind of triumphs and setbacks, arrived in Ningbo riding a wave of optimism. Fresh from a quarterfinal run at the Korea Open, she seemed poised to cap her 2025 Asian swing with another deep result. Yet, as the match wore on under temperatures hovering around 32 degrees Celsius (90 degrees Fahrenheit) with stifling humidity, Raducanu’s energy visibly ebbed. She battled not just Zhu’s resilient baseline game but also the draining effects of dehydration and fatigue, her movements growing labored by the third set. Post-match, Raducanu withdrew from her scheduled appearances in Tokyo and Hong Kong, prioritizing recovery under the guidance of her new coach, Francisco Roig—a move that underscored the toll these conditions exact on elite athletes.
This wasn’t Raducanu’s first brush with heat’s harsh realities. Throughout her career, the Brit has navigated a litany of physical challenges, from ankle surgeries to wrist injuries, but the environmental strain has emerged as a recurring villain. Her Ningbo exit echoed similar ordeals at events like the 2023 US Open, where blistering heat forced multiple retirements, and the 2024 Australian Open, where players collapsed mid-match. Raducanu’s complaints—delivered with her characteristic candor—have now amplified a chorus of voices demanding reform. “The heat here is just brutal; it’s like playing in a sauna,” she confided to reporters after the loss, her words laced with exhaustion. “You try to focus on the ball, but your body starts betraying you—sweat in your eyes, legs like lead. We need better protections, or we’re risking real harm.”
Enter Matteo Berrettini, the towering Italian powerhouse whose booming serve and old-school grit have made him a fan favorite. At 29, Berrettini knows the grind intimately, having clawed back from a debilitating elbow injury that sidelined him for much of 2023 and 2024. Now, resurgent on the ATP Tour with a semifinal berth in Shanghai earlier this month, he’s channeling his comeback energy into advocacy. Speaking from the sidelines of an exhibition event in Verona on October 18, Berrettini issued a fervent plea for the ATP to adopt mandatory heat protocols, drawing direct inspiration from Raducanu’s plight. “People don’t grasp how much of a difference five degrees makes—cooler or hotter,” he declared, his voice rising with conviction. “We’re not machines; we’re humans pushing our limits every day. In Ningbo, Emma was fighting valiantly, but you could see the toll. If we wait for a tragedy, it’ll be too late. The ATP must step up with heat rules now—suspensions, hydration breaks, whatever it takes.”
Berrettini’s call isn’t born in a vacuum. The WTA has long experimented with heat policies, implementing a “heat rule” at events like the Australian Open since 1998, which allows match suspensions when the wet-bulb globe temperature exceeds 30 degrees Celsius. This measure, triggered by a combination of air temperature, humidity, wind, and solar radiation, has saved countless points of exhaustion. Yet, its application remains inconsistent across tours and tournaments, particularly in Asia and the Middle East, where calendars pack in back-to-back events under relentless sun. Raducanu’s Ningbo woes highlight this patchwork approach: while some venues provide cooling stations and mandatory water breaks, others leave players at the mercy of organizers’ discretion.
The Italian’s urgency is amplified by a groundswell of similar grievances from the men’s side. Carlos Alcaraz, the 22-year-old Spaniard who’s dominated 2025 with titles in Indian Wells and Madrid, has been equally vocal about the sport’s punishing schedule. After his grueling five-set marathon at the 2025 French Open—played amid Paris’s unseasonal heatwave—Alcaraz didn’t mince words. “This calendar is insane; we’re machines until we’re not,” he vented in a post-match interview, sweat still beading on his brow. “Back-to-back slams, then hopping continents—it’s not sustainable. And the heat? It turns a three-hour match into survival mode. The tours need to listen before someone burns out for good.” Alcaraz’s critique, echoed by peers like Jannik Sinner and Iga Swiatek, points to a broader crisis: the ATP and WTA calendars, bloated with over 60 mandatory events per year, exacerbate environmental risks. Players jet from clay in Rome to grass in London to hard courts in New York, often with scant recovery time, turning elite competition into a test of endurance over skill.
This convergence of complaints has galvanized the Players’ Council, the athlete-led body that advises the tours on rule changes. Sources close to the group indicate that heat mitigation is topping the agenda for their November 2025 meeting in London, with proposals including universal wet-bulb thresholds, extended warm-up delays during peak heat, and even AI-monitored environmental adjustments at stadiums. Berrettini, a vocal council member, sees Raducanu’s story as a pivotal catalyst. “Emma’s not complaining for sympathy; she’s highlighting a systemic flaw,” he emphasized. “We’ve seen retirements, hospitalizations—it’s time to prioritize health over highlight reels.”
For Raducanu, the immediate path forward involves rest and recalibration. Back in London, she’s already teasing a strong 2026, with eyes on reclaiming her spot in the world’s top 10. Her Ningbo withdrawal, while disappointing, allows precious time to integrate Roig’s tactical insights—focusing on aggressive net play and mental resilience—without the shadow of burnout. Yet, her experience serves as a stark reminder of tennis’s evolution. Once a gentleman’s game played in cool European summers, it’s now a global spectacle demanding adaptation to everything from altitude in Bogotá to monsoons in Mumbai. As climate change intensifies these extremes, the sport’s guardians face an imperative: innovate or imperil the stars who light its courts.
Berrettini’s plea, intertwined with Raducanu’s raw honesty and Alcaraz’s fiery rhetoric, paints a picture of unity across genders and tours. “We’re all in this sweat together,” Berrettini quipped, blending humor with resolve. If history is any guide—think the 1970s push for equal prize money or the 2010s adoption of shot clocks—these voices could spark real reform. Imagine suspended matches under crimson skies, players retreating to shaded pavilions, emerging refreshed to unleash their best. For now, as the 2025 season winds down, the tennis world holds its breath, hoping the off-season brings not just reflection, but revolution. In a sport defined by precision and poise, protecting the human element might just be the ultimate ace.
Leave a Reply