In the ever-evolving theater of professional tennis, where fairy tales collide with the grind of reality, few stories capture the imagination quite like Emma Raducanu’s meteoric rise. It was four years ago, under the roaring lights of Arthur Ashe Stadium, that the then-18-year-old British sensation etched her name into the annals of the sport. As a qualifier—yes, a qualifier—Raducanu stormed through the 2021 US Open without dropping a single set, dismantling seasoned pros with a blend of effortless athleticism, laser-guided groundstrokes, and an unshakeable poise that belied her youth. Her final showdown against fellow teen Leylah Fernandez was a masterclass in composure, a 6-4, 6-3 victory that crowned her the first British woman to claim a Grand Slam singles title since Virginia Wade’s Wimbledon conquest in 1977. Overnight, Raducanu wasn’t just a champion; she was a phenomenon, her straight-A student backstory and multicultural roots fueling headlines from London to New York.
Fast-forward to October 2025, and the echoes of that triumph are still reverberating—now, controversially so. The spark? A stunning upset at the Shanghai Masters, where unheralded Monegasque qualifier Valentin Vacherot, a 28-year-old ranked outside the top 200, pulled off the improbable. In a tournament stacked with giants like Novak Djokovic, Carlos Alcaraz, and Jannik Sinner, Vacherot navigated a gauntlet of upsets: toppling world No. 6 Andrey Rublev in the second round, edging past qualifier Alexandre Muller, and then stunning No. 4 Taylor Fritz in a three-set thriller. The climax came in the final against lucky loser Bu Yunchaokete, another qualifier, whom Vacherot dispatched 7-6(4), 7-6(2) to claim his maiden ATP title. It was a Cinderella run for the ages, broadcast to a global audience and instantly drawing parallels to underdog tales past.
Enter John Isner, the towering American serve-bot whose 16-year career—marked by a record 14 five-set Grand Slam wins and a career-high ranking of No. 8—has made him a respected voice in the locker room. Now retired and transitioning into punditry, Isner couldn’t resist weighing in on social media, posting a photo of Vacherot hoisting the trophy with the caption: “Incredible run for this guy. More impressive than what Emma Raducanu did at the 2021 US Open.” He elaborated in a follow-up: “I think it is more impressive [what Vacherot did], yes. But Raducanu, it’s a bigger story because it’s the US Open. I think this is more improbable than what she did. But obviously, it being the US Open makes it a bigger story, even though this story is really big in the tennis world.”
The tennis universe erupted. What Isner intended as a nod to Vacherot’s grit landed like a misfired ace, igniting a firestorm of backlash from fans, analysts, and even some peers who viewed it as a dismissal of Raducanu’s unparalleled feat. “What a horrible take,” one devotee fired back bluntly, encapsulating the sentiment rippling across forums and feeds. Another delved deeper: “Emma was 18 and had just finished school. She was a rookie and a qualifier who won without losing a set. A Slam. Bigger than a 28 year old qualifier winning a Masters irrespective of who they faced. You can only play who is in front of you.” A third piled on with incredulity: “What? Nothing compares to Raducanu’s run. She was quite literally a qualifier and won a slam. Unheard of.”
The outrage wasn’t without merit. Raducanu’s path was a statistical anomaly: entering as the tournament’s lowest-ranked player at No. 150, she faced a murderers’ row including Zhang Shuai, Sara Sorribes Tormo, Shelby Rogers, Belinda Bencic, and Olympic gold medalist Jennifer Brady—dropping just 19 games across the entire event. Vacherot’s heroics, while laudable, unfolded on a smaller stage; the Shanghai Masters, though a prestigious ATP 1000, pales in prestige and pressure next to a Grand Slam’s seven-round odyssey, where every match feels like a final. Critics pointed out the age gap—Raducanu barely out of her teens, thrust into superstardom without the benefit of pro seasoning—versus Vacherot’s decade-plus on tour. “Emma’s win was lightning in a bottle, defying every odd,” one commentator noted. “Isner’s comparison ignores the context: a Slam at 18 as a qualifier is the stuff of legends, not just a ‘bigger story.'”
Isner, no stranger to controversy—recall his infamous 70-68 fifth-set marathon against Nicolas Mahut at Wimbledon 2010—doubled down initially but later walked it back, clarifying in a podcast appearance that his intent was to celebrate both achievements. “Look, Vacherot beating those top guys as a nobody? That’s nuts. Emma’s run was magical, no question. I was just hyping the improbability,” he said, his drawl laced with that signature Southern charm. Yet the damage was done, amplifying a narrative that’s dogged Raducanu since her Flushing Meadows glory: the weight of expectations. Post-US Open, she skyrocketed to No. 1 in the world briefly, inked multimillion-dollar deals with Nike and Porsche, and became a tabloid darling. But the fairy tale soured with a string of injuries—back surgery in 2022, ankle woes in 2023, wrist troubles in 2024—that sidelined her for months at a time.
By 2025, Raducanu, now 22, has shown flashes of her old fire: a quarterfinal at the Korea Open in September, where she pushed world No. 3 Coco Gauff to three sets, and a gritty third-round run at Wimbledon, upsetting No. 9 seed Maria Sakkari. She’s climbed back into the top 50, partnering with coach Nick Cavaday to refine her all-court game—those whippy backhands and pinpoint drop shots that terrorized foes in New York. Off the court, she’s evolved too, launching a sustainable fashion line and advocating for mental health in sports, drawing from her own battles with the spotlight’s glare. “That moment on the court, when I was celebrating, I was like, I would literally trade any struggle in the world for this moment,” she reflected in a 2023 interview, a poignant reminder of the joy amid the jeopardy.
This dust-up underscores tennis’s eternal tension: celebrating the new while honoring the icons. Vacherot’s win, a boon for minnows in a sport dominated by the Big Three’s heirs, injects fresh vitality into the ATP Tour. Ranked No. 182 pre-tournament, he’s now projected to crack the top 100, a lifeline for a journeyman who’s scraped by on challengers. Isner’s gaffe, intentional or not, has inadvertently spotlighted Raducanu’s resilience, reminding fans why her story endures. In a year where she’s navigated coaching changes and a grueling schedule—from the sun-baked hard courts of Asia to the slick grass of SW19—her US Open remains an untarnished beacon.
As the season barrels toward the WTA Finals in Riyadh, Raducanu eyes a deep run, perhaps her first title since that seismic September evening. Isner’s “horrible take” might sting, but it’s galvanized her supporters, turning critique into chorus. In tennis, where underdogs become legends in the blink of an eye, comparisons are inevitable—but Raducanu’s slam? That’s incomparable, a shot that still echoes across the courts. Whether Vacherot’s improbable odyssey draws level in the annals of time, one thing’s clear: Emma’s fairy tale isn’t over; it’s just entering its most compelling chapter.
Leave a Reply