The glittering world of professional darts, where pinpoint precision can turn a pub game into a multimillion-pound spectacle, is suddenly grappling with a storm of controversy. As the sport rides a wave of unprecedented popularity—fueled by teenage prodigies like Luke Littler and packed arenas from London to Las Vegas—the Professional Darts Corporation (PDC) faces a backlash over its latest rule tweak. At the heart of the row is a proposed change to how prize money counts toward the Order of Merit, the all-important two-year rolling ranking system that determines seeding, invitations to majors, and ultimately, a player’s livelihood. Critics, including vocal veterans and rising stars, are crying foul, questioning not just the equity of the system but the very mechanics of who foots the bill for this high-stakes evolution.
It all boils down to a deceptively simple adjustment: pre-qualified players—those top seeds who bypass early rounds thanks to their rankings—must now win at least their first match to earn ranking credit from the prize pot. They still pocket the cash payout, mind you, but that money won’t bolster their Order of Merit standing if they stumble out of the gates. The PDC insists this levels the playing field, preventing elite players from padding their rankings with “unearned” earnings simply for showing up. But in a sport where every leg can swing fortunes, the outcry has been swift and sharp. “Who is going to pay?” has become the rallying cry, a blunt encapsulation of the frustration echoing through locker rooms and online forums alike. It’s a question that cuts to the core: with prize funds ballooning to eye-watering heights, why should lower-ranked pros bear the brunt of travel costs, entry fees, and heartbreak without a safety net?
The flashpoint came earlier this year when the PDC unveiled its most ambitious prize money surge yet, doubling the World Darts Championship winner’s haul to a jaw-dropping £1 million starting in 2026, with the total pot swelling to £5 million. Other majors followed suit: the World Matchplay crown now dangles an extra £25,000 for the victor and runner-up, £15,000 for semi-finalists, and so on, rippling through events like the Premier League, where weekly winners snag £10,000 from a £1 million series pot. This influx, spearheaded by PDC chief Matt Porter and backed by promoter Eddie Hearn’s Matchroom empire, has supercharged the sport’s global appeal. TV ratings are soaring, sponsorships are pouring in, and sold-out crowds chant for 180s like they’re at a rock concert. Littler, the 18-year-old sensation who clinched the 2025 Worlds crown by thrashing Michael van Gerwen, embodies this boom—his £500,000 triumph last year (pre-hike) made him darts’ youngest millionaire champion, a rags-to-riches tale that has inspired a generation.
Yet beneath the glamour, cracks are showing. Welsh powerhouse Gerwyn Price, a former world number one known for his ice-cool finishes and fiery temperament, has led the charge against the ranking implications of these windfalls. “It’s unfair,” Price fumed recently, arguing that a single Worlds victory could lock a player at the top of the Order of Merit for a full year with minimal additional effort. “A player would only have to win the Worlds and not much else to confirm their spot,” he warned, highlighting how the two-year cycle—where earnings drop off after 104 weeks—could create an unbridgeable chasm between the haves and have-nots. Price’s complaints, echoed by fans and pundits on social media, have prompted Porter to concede that an overhaul might be on the cards. “We want to make sure the rankings system is fair,” the PDC chief admitted, hinting at potential reforms to balance the scales. It’s a rare admission from an organization often accused of favoring its marquee names, but with the 2026 Worlds looming at Alexandra Palace, pressure is mounting for action.
Enter the foot soldiers of darts: the Tour Card holders grinding through 128-player Pro Tour qualifiers, where a first-round exit means zero ranking points and zilch in earnings—despite shelling out for flights, hotels, and taxis that can top £500 per trip. Five-time world champion Raymond van Barneveld, the 58-year-old Dutch legend whose comeback story rivals any Hollywood script, didn’t mince words. “If you get beat, you get nothing—but you still have to pay for your flights, your hotels, your taxis,” he declared in a candid interview, calling on the PDC to introduce appearance fees or minimum payouts for early losers. “The prize money for all the majors is fantastic, but they have to start thinking about the other players as well,” van Barneveld urged. “It’s almost impossible to qualify for the big ones if you’re scraping by on the lower tours.” His plea resonates in a sport where only 32 spots exist in events like the World Matchplay, leaving the majority battling for scraps on the European Tour or Challenge events.
This isn’t the first time the PDC has navigated such waters. Back in 2024, a similar European Tour rule—requiring pre-qualified stars to win their opener for ranking credit—drew ire from the Players Development and Players Association (PDPA), leading to a partial backtrack for fairness in qualification for the European Championship. Now, with the Worlds pot exploding, the stakes feel existential. Players like Dave Chisnall and Nathan Aspinall, mid-table mainstays who’ve voiced mental health struggles amid the grind, worry that the system entrenches inequality. “Seriously, it really shouldn’t be this hard to at least offer a £250 non-ranking payout to cover travel expenses,” one fan-turned-pundit vented online, a sentiment shared by dozens in darts’ passionate Reddit community.
For the PDC, the dilemma is acute. Porter’s team points to the sport’s growth—women’s events like the Women’s Series now offering Worlds invites based on merit, and affiliate tours in Asia and Australia funneling fresh talent—as proof of progress. Yet the “Who is going to pay?” refrain underscores a deeper truth: darts’ blue-collar roots clash with its burgeoning billionaire status. Self-employed contractors deduct a 2% PDC levy on every payout, from Challenge Tour crumbs to championship hauls, leaving pros like Littler (whose leaked payslip revealed hefty post-tax windfalls) and journeymen alike feeling the pinch.
As the 2025/26 season hurtles toward its Ally Pally climax, this row threatens to overshadow the treble chases and nine-dart dreams. Will Porter’s hinted reforms—perhaps capping Worlds’ ranking weight or mandating early-round minimums—quell the unrest? Or will it fracture the unity that’s propelled darts into the mainstream? One thing’s certain: in a game decided by millimeters, the battle for financial parity is proving just as unforgiving. Players lace up their boots not just for glory, but survival—and with voices like Price and van Barneveld amplifying the call, the PDC can’t afford to miss this double. The oche, ever the great equalizer, awaits their next throw.
Leave a Reply